|
A special Work In Progress report
to mark the 100th painting in Ivan Berryman's series of first world war aces
and aircraft.
This original painting
- canvas size 78 inches x 36 inches, price
£12,000. SOLD
The 100th
Painting
After
three years of almost continuous toil, my series of paintings of World War 1
aces and their aircraft is approaching its 100th
canvas and, to mark this milestone, we have decided to make it
something special. I have chosen to undertake a very large oil painting, one
that will make a stunning centrepiece to any collection.
As I have
mentioned previously, many World War 1 aerial combats involved huge amounts of
aircraft, all wheeling and diving within a very small area. Collisions were
frequent and individual battles were often made all the more hazardous by
disorientation and by mistaken identity. Life and death was decided by a
combination of airmanship, marksmanship and instinct. Some pilots were
naturally gifted whilst others had to learn their skills the hard way,
frequently with tragic results. In some respects, the outcome of each duel was
a lottery and a victory might be attributable to a fluke, a lucky shot. It is
my intention to depict some of this chaos in this very special painting.
Of course,
the greatest of them all was the celebrated Rittmeister Mannfred von
Richthofen, the Red Baron, and it seems fitting therefore that he should
occupy centre stage for my epic painting which will depict the occasion of his
final victory – his eightieth – on the day before he died.
This
battle took place in the skies just west of Amiens on 20th April
1918 when Richthofen’s Circus encountered Sopwith Camels of No 3 and No 201
Squadron. Great German pilots such as Richard Wenzl, Hans Weiss, Werner
Stienhauser – as well as von Richthofen himself – found themselves
embroiled in a battle with their British contemporaries. Major Richard
Raymond-Barker fell to The Baron’s guns and was killed in the ensuing crash
and, just three minutes later, Second Lieutenant David Lewis was sent down in
flames by the same little red Fokker DR.1 Triplane, but he survived the impact
relatively unscathed and, no doubt, dined out for many years on the fact that
he transpired to be the great German ace’s last ever victim. The next day,
Sunday 21st April 1918, the Red Baron met his end, brought down by
ground fire whilst in pursuit of what was very nearly his 81st
‘kill’.
My
painting will feature von Richthofen’s all red DR.1 425/17 giving chase to
Lewis’s Sopwith Camel in the immediate foreground whilst, all around them,
other brightly decorated DR.1s of the Circus are engaged with their
opponents as far as the eye can see.
|
| Commentary in
this column |
Related photos in this column |
| |
|
Work
Begins!
The
first stage of any painting is to source the colour schemes and serial
numbers of the aircraft taking part and to link this information to
the pilots that flew them and then to arrange each ‘event’ to be
included in the painting into a chronologically correct composition.
For example, Raymond-Barker’s aircraft will not be in the painting
because he had been sent down slightly earlier in the conflict.
Lieutenant L A Hamilton, in Camel D6519, is known to have engaged a
‘blue’ Triplane (possibly Eberhardt Mohnicke) at about the same
time of the Lewis / von Richthofen battle, so this could be
included.
Now,
using some accurate but generic model kits, I begin to take
photographs from every conceivable angle (picture 1). For von
Richthofen’s aircraft, I get in close with a wide angle lens to
force the perspective. This produces a very usable image as shown in
picture 2.
|

Picture 1

Picture 2
|
|
With
the photographs suitably enlarged and montaged, I can start work
marking out the positions and shapes of each main aircraft in the
picture on the canvas (picture 3). Only now does the true scale of
this massive painting become apparent; the wingspan of Triplane 425/17
is almost three feet! |

Picture 3 |
|
In
picture 4, I have covered the entire canvas with a neutral grey coat
of paint. This helps me to work up the lightest and darkest areas of
the painting in relation to each other (I liken this technique to
playing a tune on a piano. If you start playing too high on the
keyboard - too light - you won’t have any top notes when you need
them. If you play too low - too dark - the opposite applies. Start
playing in the middle and you can embellish either way. And you’ll
still have real whites left for your highlights and real darks left
for your shadows). |

Picture 4
|
|
The
action that I am depicting took place at around 18.40pm and official
combat reports describe the weather as being ‘overcast, but
improving’, which isn’t terribly helpful, so I have opted to paint
broken cloud to err on the safe side. With this in mind, the next
stage is to outline where the main cloud features will be (picture 5)
and then, because the ground needs to be visible through breaks in the
cloud, I block in a dark area (picture 6). I always think it’s
important to show some of the ground if possible. It gives the
composition some depth and perspective and, if done well, can offer a
real feeling of vertigo and altitude. As will transpire later, the
angle and forced perspective that I have chosen for von Richthofen’s aircraft (the nearest) as
he chases Lewis’ Camel down should add to this illusion. |

Picture 5

Picture 6
|
|
In
photograph 7, I can be seen painting in some of the details of the
ground below – not too much, as it is going to appear very gloomy
down there and much of the cloud is going to obscure the terrain
anyway.
|

Picture 7
|
|
At
last, work on the clouds themselves can begin (pictures 8 & 9). On
a canvas of this scale, this is going to take a while and is going to
need some constant checking and adjustment. (I have moved the canvas
into another room of my studio for this part, a room where I can step
back and get a good idea of what I am achieving while I am working on
it). My original white cloud outlines will help me to keep the whole
scene in perspective, but working too close to a giant canvas can
cause all sorts of problems that don’t become apparent until you
step back – so keep stepping back and checking! |

Picture 8

Picture 9 |
|
Progress
is quite rapid as I work my way across the canvas, building up the
layers of cloud (photograph 10), and it is soon time for those final
touches before stripping away the masking before the paint dries too
much, as in photograph 11.
|

Picture 10

Picture 11 |
|
In
photograph 12, all the masking has been removed and the aircraft
outlines
are
clearly visible. This is going to be a typical dogfight scene for the
period with aircraft seemingly going in all directions, even though
only six Triplanes from von Richthofen’s Circus are believed to have
taken part. Research (and some much-valued expert help) has allowed me
to understand some of what happened that morning and photograph 13
shows who is included in my painting and what part each pilot played.
Nearest,
of course, is Manfred von Richthofen’s DR.1 who is lining up
Lewis’ Camel (B7393). Lewis was in C-Flight, under Ginger Bell, and
I was fully expecting to show this by the colour of Lewis’ wheel
covers, but my sources have revealed that the colour coding of each
flight was not undertaken until May 1918 – a week or two after the
event that I am depicting. Even the code letters or numbers that would
have been allocated to each flight were never recorded, so a little
artistic licence will have to be reluctantly employed. All we know is
that Lewis’ Camel would have carried any letter from ‘S’ to
‘X’ on the cockpit sides, as well as the two vertical bars behind
the cockade that was 3 Squadron’s identification marking.
According
to his combat report, Hamilton is known to have ‘chased down’ a
‘blue’ DR.1. This is believed to be the mount of Eberhardt
Mohnicke (DR.1 155/17) and I have shown this battle in the far
distance, in photograph 14 and in a detail shot in photograph 15.
Although hardly visible in the photograph, faint dark tracers from
Hamilton’s guns can be seen streaking beneath Mohnicke’s aircraft
as he twists and turns in avoidance.
Also
almost completed in Photograph 14 and detailed in 16 is Werner
Steinhauser’s DR.1 (564/17), shown as just a white dot in the
full-width photograph. Steinhauser is depicted chasing Riley’s
‘B’ Flight Camel (No 6475), furiously raking his opponent.
Riley was wounded in the action, but managed to return home safely.
Finally,
returning to Photograph 13, Hamilton’s flight leader, Bell, can be
seen diving steeply to escape Hans Weiss who had already claimed a 201
Squadron Camel earlier that day. Bell was flying C7630 and Weiss
545/17.
This
is already a painting full of aircraft, but I may yet add other
machines in the distance as work progresses. It was, after all, quite
common for two aircraft to go after one and, sometimes, a whole chain
of aircraft could develop that twisted and curled around the sky as if
they were joined.
But
maybe I’ll save that for another painting…
|
Picture 12

Picture 13

Picture 14

Picture 15

Picture 16 |
|
Work
on each aircraft now continues, but I find myself having to wait for
some additional information on Flight Leader Ginger Bell’s Camel,
which is going to hold up progress a bit on the British side. I
instead turn my attention to the DR.1s of Jasta 11 that are already
fully researched. However, it transpires that Werner Steinhauser’s
Dr.1 564/17 had a pair of yellow eyes painted on the cowl of his
aircraft in a similar style to Werner Voss, so these will need to be
added as this aircraft is shown flying almost head-on toward us and
would be a glaring omission!
After
some deliberation, I have decided to include Leutnant Richard Wenzl in
the painting as he, too, got involved in the fighting that day, flying
588/17, decorated with his ‘Iron Cross’ ribbon band wrapped around
the fuselage and distinctive black & white wing leading edges. I
have placed his aircraft high above Hamilton’s Camel, rolling in to
join the fray and I think this is an interesting addition to the
action, as shown in the top right corner of photograph 17 and detailed
in 18. This proved a bit fiddly as, even on this huge canvas,
Wenzl’s aircraft is only 4.5cm from wingtip to wingtip!
|

Picture 17

Picture 18 |
|
Also
completed now is Hans Weiss’ white-tailed DR.1 (545/17) which will
transpire to be corkscrewing down on the tail of Ginger Bell’s
Camel. The lighting is coming from the top left in the painting and
some might conclude that I have mistakenly lit the underside of the
DR.1, visible in photograph 19. But when set in context, as in
photograph 20, it is clear that the undersides of the aircraft are in
fact reflecting the bright cloud in the background as Weiss rolls his
machine round to get a bead on his opponent.
Whilst
I await the research on the Camels, now it is time to turn my
attention to The Baron himself…
|

Picture 19

Picture 20 |
|
There
has been much speculation about the appearance of DR.1 425/17 which
was the only Triplane used by von Richthofen that was painted entirely
in red. It is known that red paint was in short supply, so a demand to
paint an entire aircraft in this colour would have stretched the
resources somewhat. To help get over this problem, it is recorded that
a quantity of black paint was added to the mix to make it go a little
further and to improve its density, so the brilliant scarlet so often
depicted is probably not entirely accurate. That said, a red aircraft
– even a ‘plummy’ red aircraft – in the bright sunlight would
appear quite striking, so I am not going to dull it down too much
where the fabric is in direct light.
Having
covered up much of the painting with some paper to avoid splashes and
damaged caused by dropped brushes (I can be so clumsy sometimes!) in
photograph 21, I have begun work on the undersides of all three wings
and the undercarriage faring. The wings are, of course, in shadow, but
the taut fabric is pretty reflective, so I’ve added a sheen and then
picked out the ribs of the structure beneath. These ribs are important
as they also denote where the ‘batwing’ effect on the trailing
edge of each wing appears. The crosses have been put into place and
the beginnings of the reflections where the wing struts will
eventually attach have been roughed in. The ailerons have yet to be
added, together with a lot of minor detailing.
The
rudder is also underway, as shown in photograph 22, and I have taken
care to show just a vestige of the original old-style cross showing
through the worn paintwork behind the new Balkenkreuze. This
aircraft had its crosses amended twice during its lifetime and the
poor quality of the paint, coupled with continuous weathering, left
the national markings looking decidedly scruffy by this time. This
process will be repeated, slightly more pronounced, on the fuselage
side. (The crosses were cut from the wreck of 425/17 by
souvenir-hunting infantrymen the very next day when Manfred crashed
fatally near the Somme River and most survive to this day in museums,
clearly showing just how worn they were).
|

Photograph 21

Photograph 22 |
|
A
few clear days with no interruptions means that real progress can be
made, as shown in photograph 23. With the fuselage, tailplane and much
of the undercarriage now complete, von Richthofen’s aircraft is
approaching the final stages. No interplane, cabane or undercarriage
struts have yet been applied, but the tail struts and control wires
are in place and more or less finished.
Now
that the cross on the fuselage is visible, the slightly ‘cocked’
rudder is more evident and I have added just a little tilt to the
elevators to add some movement to the chase.
In
photograph 24, the great man himself (or the top of his head anyway)
is roughed in. There will be a little more work here later on, and the
only visible one of two LMG 08/15 machine guns is complete. The worn
and overpainted cross on the fuselage side can be seen in this
photograph and the whole completed fuselage is given a good
‘weathering’. Around the area of the tail skid, which has not yet
been painted, a lot of mud and scuffing is applied.
Next
will be some sign of the spinning rotary engine beneath the cutaway
cowl and just a suggestion of the propeller before the wheel struts
and wires can be applied.
|

Photograph 23

Photograph 24 |
|
Et
Voila! Photograph 25 shows the finished DR.1 in close-up and
Photograph 26 shows it in context with the next stage of the painting,
namely Lewis’ Sopwith Camel. I have resisted the temptation to add
too many highlights and sparkles on the Triplane. Although glints of
sunlight can really lift a painting and bring it to life, it would not
have been appropriate here as the aircraft sides were quite dull and
war-weary. A sheen, yes, but not a blinding glare.
And
whilst we’re on the subject of subtlety, I have added the propeller
now, which appears just as a wisp. So too does the rotary engine which
is, of course, turning at the same speed.
I
am always careful not to make too much of spinning propellers in my
paintings. There is a tradition in aviation art to paint props as
blurry stubs, but this is merely how we have come to perceive a
turning airscrew through the medium of photography, which partially
stops the ‘action’ to varying degrees, depending on the shutter
speed used. If you observe an aircraft with the naked eye when it is
at full chat, there is almost no visible evidence of the propeller at
all, except perhaps when the sun catches it, or when viewed side-on.
Just a thought, but worth a mention… |
Photograph 25

Photograph 26 |
|
I
am extremely indebted to Andy Kemp, whose wealth of knowledge on all
things Sopwith Camel has proved invaluable in the completion of this
painting. His detailed information and supporting photographs have
ensured as much accuracy as is possible regarding the aircraft of C
Flight of No3 Squadron that took part in this action. It seems that
the Camels involved had little uniformity when it came to the placing
and style of serial numbers. With Lewis’ machine appearing more or
less dead centre in the composition, it was going to be absolutely
necessary to get this one right. In photograph 27, B7393 is now
complete and in photograph 28, you can see now how Lewis has placed
his aircraft in a very precarious position indeed – right in the
path of von Richthofen’s DR.1, soon to become victim No 80.
Although
not shown in this painting (because he had already been shot down by
the Red Baron a few minutes earlier), Raymond Barker’s Camel D6439
would have appeared quite different, carrying no identification number
or letter on its sides and upper wing and with the serial repeated
forward of the tailplane in a white Sopwith-type box.
As
mentioned earlier, C Flight’s blue wheel covers and, later, engine
covers, were not applied at this time. Most published profiles show
No3 Squadron’s aircraft displaying either red (A Flight), white (B
Flight) or blue wheel covers, but it is thought that these were not
applied until May 1918, a few weeks after the action that I am
depicting here had taken place.
Because
no records exist of the exact personal letters and numbers carried on
each aircraft and so few photographs are available of this precise
period (the code letters were not recorded in squadron record books
and only mentioned in a pilot’s combat report if relevant for some
reason), the only bit of artistic licence that I must, reluctantly,
employ here is the code letter on Lewis’ aircraft which would have
been any letter between ‘S’ and ‘X’. I have opted for ‘U’.
Incidentally,
B Flight’s Camels carried identifying numbers instead of letters at
this time.
In
photograph 29, I have returned to the left half of the painting and
added Bell’s Camel C7630, diving and rolling away from Hans Weiss’
DR.1. Although very small in the painting, I have taken the trouble to
show a little ‘up’ elevator and alternate aileron positions on the
wings to demonstrate the manoeuvre. |
 Photograph
27

Photograph 28

Photograph 29 |
|
Into
the closing stages now, the final aircraft in the picture. Photograph
30 shows work underway on Riley’s Camel No 6495. The wings, tail and
fuselage side is largely complete, but the struts and bracing wires
have yet to be added.
Riley’s
aircraft has found some sunlight through a gap in the clouds, so I can
put a few more highlights where the sun glints off the taut fabric and
metal engine cowl, just to give this corner of the painting a bit of a
lift. I will be adding a bit of damage to 6495 later, as Steinhauser
is shown having a good ‘squirt’ at his opponent and Riley is known
to have been injured during the combat. A few bullet holes and some
rips in the fabric should do it.
And
so it all draws to an end. Photograph 31 shows Riley’s completed
Camel
turning
away from the main action and trying to escape the attentions of
Werner Steinhauser. All struts, wires and undercarriage assembly are
now in place and a lot of detailing and weathering has been added.
6495 was a comparatively old aircraft by this time, so I’ve roughed
it up a bit and added a lot of oil staining beneath the engine,
streaming back along the underside of the fuselage. Just visible on
the port lower mainplane and port tailplane are some bullet holes. I
don’t know exactly how much damage was sustained to Riley’s
machine during this action, so it is best to be conservative. He was
injured, but not seriously.
The
finished painting is presented in photograph 32, but I have to confess
that it looks a lot less dramatic when reduced to just a few
centimetres. I wish that I could share the spectacle of the real thing
with you in all its 2-metre (6 ft 7 inches) magnificence!
Above
all though, I hope that this will stand as a record of how that aerial
battle on 20th April 1918 may have looked and as a tribute
to the brave young men on both sides who fought so gallantly and with
such great self sacrifice for a cause that each so fervently believed
in.
The
very next day, Manfred von Richthofen, the revered ‘Red Baron’
was brought down, killed – ironically - by a single bullet, probably
fired from the ground as his little red Triplane chased William
‘Wop’ May’s Sopwith Camel along the Somme River. That his
aircraft did not flip over suggests that he was conscious enough, at
least for a while, to switch off his engine and perhaps attempt a
landing. We will never know.
What
we do know is that his aircraft was immediately surrounded by ground
troops and stripped of all its national markings. The Baron’s body
was recovered and taken to Poulainville, the home of No3 Squadron
where a guard of honour was formed to bury him in Bertangles Cemetary
with full military honours.
An
era had ended. A legend had been born.
|
 Photograph
30

Photograph 31

|
|